re: cave-in to radicaism hanrahan All this horror and rioting and death

ALLEGEDLY

over the cartoon printed in the Danish then other Euro papers....???????

Balderdash!

Turns out they were printed IN AN AR AB PUBLICATION.........

....

4 MONTHS AGO!!!!!

Not just madmen but calculating madmen

Something is afoot.......

Mu slim newspaper ran cartoons 4 months ago
No outrage when Egy ptian publication headlined drawings on Ram adan cover


Muha mmad cartoon on Egy pt's al-Fagr newspaper cover in October 2005 (courtesy: Freedom for Eg yptians)

While Mus lims across the world have rioted in the past week against countries whose newspapers have published cartoons of the prophet Muh ammad, there was no uproar when the same caricatures were prominently displayed in an Isla mic newspaper four months ago.

The images originating in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten in September were reportedly featured on the cover and inside pages of Eg ypt's al-Fagr (the Dawn) in October, during the holy month of Ra madan.

According to the Freedom for Egy ptians blog, al-Fagr included the cartoons on the front cover and page 17 of its edition dated Oct. 17. The headline, when translated, is said to read: "Continued Boldness. Mocking the Prophet and his wife by Caricature."



Muha mmad cartoons on page 17 of Eg ypt's al-Fagr newspaper in October 2005 (courtesy: Eg yptian Sandmonkey blog)

"The Eg yptian paper criticized the bad taste of the cartoons but it did not incite hatred protests," notes the blog. "It would have been better that this [current] holy war against Denmark be launched during the holy month of Ramadan as many Mus lims believe that Jih ad during Ramadan would have been more worthy. This irrelevant outrage timing is but a sign that this violent response to the cartoons is politically motivated by Mu slim extremists in Europe and the so-called secular governments of the Middle East. I want also to mention that despite the fact that all editors who tried to reprint the cartoons in the Middle East nowadays were arrested, the Egyptian editors went unharmed."

To date, at least 10 people have been killed in Afg hanistan alone from Mu slim riots in connection with the cartoons, though protests have been taking place in many countries throughout Europe and the Mideast. Some 4,000 angry Mu slims took to the streets of the Egy ptian capital of Cairo this week, though there were no protests when al-Fagr published the images during Ramadan in October.

Interestingly, an Associated Press story in the Khaleej Times of the United Ar ab Emirates reports al-Fagr reprinted copies of the cartoons this week, but published only "the upper half of some of the controversial cartoons, omitting any facial representations. Adel Hamoudah, editor of al-Fagr, said he took copies of the cartoons from the Internet for the Tuesday edition and published them as a means of emphasizing their 'impudence.' He did not explain, however, why he chose only to print the upper half of the caricatures."

It's not clear if the paper even mentioned it previously published the entire images on its cover and interior in October.

"This tells me one thing, at least, and that is the Eg yptians who get this newspaper and who took to the streets are either incredibly stupid, hypocritical, or both," said an anonymous poster on FFE's blog. "They are stupid because they believe what they're told by the A rab press in the previous week without checking for the facts. They are hypocritical if they protested the second time they saw the cartoons and not protested when it was first printed. Here, I'm going to go out on a limb and say 'both.'"

Meanwhile in the U.S., the AP, the largest news-gathering organization in the world, is being attacked by a California newspaper editor over the wire service's refusal to distribute the cartoons of Muhammad.

"But what is incredible is that the Associated Press, which distributes news stories and photos from across the globe, has decided that you shouldn't see it," writes editor Don Holland of the Daily Press in Victorville, Calif. "What is offensive is that AP fancies itself to be the guardian of good taste for thousands of American newspapers rather than letting individual newspapers make that decision.