Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Harvard historian: strategy of climate science, page-21

First 21 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pintohoo

96,889 Posts.

75

27/07/14

17:36

Post #: 13721410
Share

Originally posted by tinnitus ↑

Pinto
My suggestion is based on exactly the same logic you presented .
And there is lies your problem.

There is a large amount of money in the Anti AGW movement.

Why isn't this money being used on anti AGW research?

Look again at what you said. You said that researchers are not being allowed to publish negative results because the pro AGW money people will not let them publish.

So why dont those researchers contact the anti AGW movement , get funding and then publish their research that has been suppressed?

And here in lies why what you have said is wrong.

Because quite simply , the science doesnt give a rats arse about its funding.

Its getting warmer , and you can be a denier , or a delayer , or whatever label you like or dont like.

The Science is still the same. Its getting warmer and we are the cause at this time.

Expand

Remind me again tin,

How does one prove a negative?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: How a megadam in Tibet pushed us into the red

RML

Resolution Minerals appoints industry experts to fast-track US growth strategy

ASX Market Open: Extraordinary RBA vote minutes lead Oz futures into rise | July 23

CIA

'Share long-term visions': Champion Iron rallies on mooted Nippon, Sojitz partnership

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

First 21 Last