Coldest morning in 126 years, page-111

  1. 12,969 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 611
    Hi mjp2, I like your post. Most of that seems to be pretty much correct. I feel you missed two important point though. What denialists want is some evidence and there is no credible evidence. That is the whole crux of the matter. What warmist take as evidence can be easily refuted by any credible scientist. As has been said many times across millions of blogs and articles etc. It only takes one assumption to be wrong to disprove a theory. With AGW there are dozens of wrong assumptions.

    The second is your descriptions applied to denialists could just as easily be applied to warmists. eg:

    "What is wrong with these folk? I know a lot of them. They live in a self reinforcing bubble. They actively subscribe to and receive lobbying via political channels, including warmist sources tailored for them."
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.