"The whole problem with the "skeptics" movement is that they don't seem to realise that if you want to draw the right conclusion you have to use *all* the facts - not just the ones you "like". So on the one hand we have climate scientists pulling together data from thousands of weather stations, satellites, oceanic buoys, painstaking analysis of tree rings, fossil coral, pollen, stalactites using state-of-the-art equipment, and applying it to analyses of the Earth system using our best current understanding of radiative physics, fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, to draw conclusions about the range of likely outcomes."
And the whole problem with warmists is that when the actual outcomes don't match the "conclusions about the range of likely outcomes" ----
they insist that they are right ----------------- in the face of RESULTS.
I am sorry, the planet and its temperature and weather are just NOT doing what warmists concluded 'likely'.
If the planet were humming along to warmists tunes ------- we would be getting awfully warm in the last 20 years --------- FACT is, we aren't.
Then we have the alarmist warmists -------------- and their 'likely outcomes' have hit the wall even harder.
No more snow!
We are up to our butt in snow.
No more big rains!
Our dams are full and the raincoat sales are going gangbusters.
god knows what else they alarmed about - most people on the planet think the weather and climate is doing just dandy.
You can use some of the facts or you can use all of the facts ---------- what you can't argue about is ----------
the result.
And the result is - human comfort and production is fine. Plus we can swim in our dams and we can go skiing.
That is the result of our 20 years of worry. FACT.
