Not at all. Pointing
General statement about how many of us do really care. What are we /you doing about it if you feel that strongly about it. Dont read to much out that genius.
In regards to Co2 and temp. The link is obvious. You keep telling us it is. Co2 forces temp rise.
Hence referral to past temps and sudden rises with no explanation for that.
There is a past history of temp rise. Why is not now of similar mechanisms that are creating this change.
If you cant tell me what created these changes in the past so i can discount that as a factor dont expect me to accept your theory as fact. Explain the past and i will listen to views. Milankovitch cycles does not cut it i am afraid. The cycles dont match up. Hint even NASA are now putting a lot more weight into Solar sunspots and cosmic radiation. Seems we are only just learning that. Also alignment of planets have a greater correlation to more sunspots.
So when i see historical data that is not tampered with that shows cyclical events that coincide with today. Events of past temp rises that are less than today when the raw data is viewed.
Simply i do not trust homogenized data. And that is applicable to both sides of the coin.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Skeptic vs Warmist
Skeptic vs Warmist, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online