Pseudo,
I disagree with your opinion of Bolt and as a business person who has been very successful in a variety of fields, I have spent my whole life cutting through the bull, I don't see any with Bolt. He is pretty quick to correct and apologise anything that he posts that is wrong.
Regarding his site,there are plenty of negative, critical comments on there every day. However they must be reasonably polite in nature.
No I wouldn't care about him at all, which is my point. He has a large following because people agree with his views. He is very discerning. That is all I have ever said.
Naturally, I cannot speak for him, but if he were to change his mind, I would imagine that it would be a gradual thing as new supportive information came to light. You cannot argue against supported facts.( However, it would seem that what some deem to be a supported fact, others do not. )
That info would be the subject of various articles and readers would get to make up their own minds. I certainly would.
I think it fair to say that I would take a longer consideration of that info, than what I would with some others, because I have learnt to value and respect his opinion.
The thing I always fail to understand is why people such as yourself think there is some ulterior motive in disputing CAGW. There is no ulterior motive other than the facts do not support the argument. It's so Simple.
