re: for sue 12 "I was thinking maybe RIO, if not obliged, needs to show partners in lost lease that they (RIO) have tried everything to get it back (prior to forming an alliance to fight on. While also wanting the problem to go away. So giving their inadequate legal arguements a public airing would give the press amunition?
I bet the submissions are not made public after the decision."
great post that makes a lot of sense
as far as RIO and partner uniting to sue CAZ that wouldnt make it to court, CAZ simply pegged vacant dirt.. pritchart sues rio?? posties probably covered (if that story is even legit)
mr markes, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | $2.552K | 134.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 139578 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 425001 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAZ (ASX) Chart |