If it was true, the AFP have the powers to act.
The fact that when those supporting the claim that Halal certification funds "
directly support terrorism" are asked to supply something more than scare mongering and rumor, the response is the runaround.
I think you will find there are those that rely on Truthiness rather than a logical argument to support their assertions, which is the reason for the runaround.
How hard is it?
A claim has been made.
A question as to the basis of the claim was asked.
The responses have done nothing to address the reasons for reaching the conclusion of the claims.
Are people just supposed to blindly believe the claims and not ask how the claim was arrived at?
If people don't know how or why the claim that Halal certification funds "
directly support terrorism" has been reached, then why do people believe it to be true?
It is a basic and simple question that seems to have stumped quite a few here.
********************************************
The claim is "....These fees, paid by ordinary Australians on everyday food and grocery items
directly support terrorism..."
Without the runaround, what is the basis for the claim??????
********************************************
P.S. duty, my answer to your question is in Post #:
14008225.
