So you are saying you and others have information that Halal certification is "Directly" funding terrorism, and the AFP are not taking any action despite it being against the law.
And when I ask to the basis of the claim that "....These fees, paid by ordinary Australians on everyday food and grocery items directly support terrorism...", the response was:-
we don't have to substantiate the claim,
Halal is a con,
We feel they are, so they should prove they aren't,
If they don't support terrorism, then they should prove it,
It's true because we say so,
You don't support the Australian way of life,
Where does the money go?
Your a GetUp graduate,
The word "Directly" is just semantics,
The claim is valid because the results are the same,
etc...
A recap of the original question. ***********************
Post #:14007586
The claim is "....These fees, paid by ordinary Australians on everyday food and grocery items directly support terrorism..."
And the basis for the claim is??????
**********************
There was a lot of dancing around to avoid the question.
P.S. olive blossom, the Australian way of life doesn't involve making accusations without putting up supporting proof or arguments to back up those accusations. If you think otherwise, then you have a poor understanding of the Australian way of life.
