MNS Vs TON, page-68

Here something i draw up from TON JORC.
MNS currently Assumption which i think we had the closed figure from previous post.
Based on C, D, F. (3 blocks out of 7)

I model up based on cutoff 5%, also with MNS considuring the minium concentration percentage of 6% from range (6-12%) as insurance.

	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5	Column 6	Column 7	Column 8
0	5% CutOff
1
2	MNS	Graphite Contain	Depth	Jumbo Distribution (~180umm)	Jumbo Mt	MOU	Served Yr MOU	MOU Tickoff
3	55@6%	3.3Mt	46-64m	45%	1.415	200000tpa	7
4	115@6%	6.9Mt	46-64m	45%	3.1	200000tpa	15	Yes
5	55@6%	19.8Mt	400m	45%	8.91	200000tpa	44.5	Yes
6	115@6%	41.4Mt	400m	45%	18.63	200000tpa	93.15	Yes
7
8	TON	Graphite Contain	Depth	Jumbo Distribution (~180umm)	Jumbo Mt	MOU Assumption
9	1124@11%	20Mt	46-64m	23%	4.6	200000tpa	23
10	1124@11%	123.64Mt	400m	23%	28.4	200000tpa	142

conclusion, we surely tick this MOU off.