Powers of a single judge of appeal
19. The powers of the Court under this Part of this Act-
(a) to give leave to appeal;
(b) to extend the time within which a notice of appeal or an application for leave to appeal may be given or within which any other matter or thing may be done;
(c) to give leave to amend a notice of appeal or respondent's notice;
(d) to give directions as to service;
(e) to admit a person to appeal in forma pauperis;
(f) to stay execution or make any interim order to prevent prejudice to the claims of any party pending an appeal;
(g) generally, to hear any application, make any order, or give any direction incidental to an appeal or intended appeal, not involving the decision of the appeal,
may be exercised by any judge of the Court in the same manner as they may be exercised by the Court and subject to the same provisions; but, if the judge refuses an application to exercise any such power or if any party is aggrieved by the exercise of such power, the applicant or party aggrieved shall be entitled to have the matter determined by the Court as duly constituted for the hearing and determining of appeals under this Act.
"if the judge refuses an application to exercise any such power or if any party is aggrieved by the exercise of such power, the applicant or party aggrieved shall be entitled to have the matter determined by the Court as duly constituted for the hearing and determining of appeals under this Act."
IMO, "the applicant or party aggrieved", being SMM, in the injunction action dated 30th Sept, (by memory), has the right to appeal the judgments made by "that" Appeals Court Judge, to a Full Bench of the Appeals Court, according to this ACT.
To appeal a Court of Appeals Judges ruling, is like going to his mates and saying the he is, like maybe for example, corrupt, biased, unethical or mabe a plain idiot, but that is the right of "the applicant or party aggrieved".
Not trying to upset anyone here, I just try to keep the facts straight, IMO.
Expand
