Bickering, page-7

Yes they have promised that before the end of this year. However your post didn't address most of my points ;-) But thats fine.

Anyways talking about the p3 for low back pain disc. My viewpoint is I would have much preferred they had partnered with another pharmaceutical company to do that.
Purely me guessing here but from my POV it makes logical sense.......if the disc repair had great results that they were highly confident in why would they not go for a partership with another pharma?

Silviu has been talking for literally years about more partnerships and it hasn't happened. A partnership provides MSB with so many benefits and from a shareholder perspective it would put a rocketship under the shareprice and provide the market with a clear clear signal that MSB is the real deal.
TWO partnerships with pharma companies as opposed to just the one.......and that one we have looked shaky as hell from the beginning.

Instead MSB is funding this with their own cash which given their burn rate I calculate they run OUT of money in 1.5-2 years.
So for that reason I'm not sure why they didn't do a partnership but my brain tells me its because their results so far were not compelling enough for anybody to bite.
But I say that as my POV.