'Also, wanting to reduce carbon dioxide/methane and other emissions =/= wanting to rid the world of electricity'
We all know the only way to reduce co2 is nuclear. Insisting on farcical schemes like solar and wind are akin to the dark ages.
Greens want: no coal, no uranium, but solar (thanks to fossil fuels we can produce them, with no guarantee they will generate more energy than they took to produce) wind, well, if you want to trash the environment (ie, absolutely no evidence to support carbon positive, let alone carbon payback).
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why pay for BOM?
Why pay for BOM?, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
JBY
JAMES BAY MINERALS LIMITED
Andrew Dornan, Executive Director
Andrew Dornan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online