Performance, page-101

Hi Abdm,

I see how every post that reflects a negative view of the stock can be spring boarded to the top of HC so this is probably my last post addressed to you.

I am not going to argue with you about HFT because your assumption that HFT firms don't hold overnight is extremely bogus. After the first 6 months at HFT firms, you have a pretty large margin to play off and each trader gets to make their own decision on what they choose to do. For once your knowledge about HFT is extremely superficial.

Regarding OBJ, this entire forum is swayed by your posts and hostility spawns if anyone goes against you.

Are you suggesting all the following information is wrong

If that be the case then I think I would require some clarification on BY selling out ?

I wonder if you have rebuttal for the following information ?

- Directors sold out after the PG announcement. Please dont cite undervalued pay because here it is a question of corporate ethics and SH value before directors pockets.

- The broker pumping this stock sold out as soon as P&G deal signed ? 600% profit argument really ? If they think good things are coming why sell ?

- The average small parcel holder increased while large parcel holders remained the same ?

- On the back of below the average salary , performance incentives in millions are signed ?

- No insto or bank is even willing to put 1% ?

- Top 20 holders comprise of a surprisingly large number of holdings in WA leederville where OBJ is located ?

- Sister company PNO whose director also sits on the board has not a single buyer on exchange ?

- 3-4 posters here posts only on OBJ pulling in market sensitive information.

Let me guess. You did not go to the AGM. Yet you will have all the information about the AGM. You will also have the information about which director said what ? Let me also guess no one has ever met you before. Let me guess you will have extensive information about PG working models. Hence you failed to highlight the negatives like PG pays net 75, PG has supplier agreements, PG does launch in a segmented market as highlighted by posters before and more than 65% of the company's innovation comes from outside and so on.

So there is nothing phenomenal about this PG agreement such that even PG is not willing for it to be disclosed. The truth is PG works even with start ups and you are inflating the worldview of how PG is at the mercy of OBJ.

Let's look at some Aussie Bio's with Insto interest

AHZ
CAJ
EBO
IPD
MYX
NAN
SUD
ADO
NEU

Heck even POH has insto's on board after their Ogru incident.

Either way, whatever you post this will be my last post addressed to you. It seems that you will again use this opportunity to springboard to the top.

Good luck with you company.