If i understand it correctly, CVT only encrypts a document, it does not encrypt a network.
If someone was looking to protect their payments network, as an example, then CVTwould not be suited to this.
If someone was looking to protect all confidential correspondence then CVT is the best option.
So, if someone was to hack Walmart again and try to obtain the Credit Card info, would CVT have stopped this?
My thinking is that a company may spend a lot of money to protect the network but then also spend a little more to further encrypt the individual files. CVT gets a smaller piece of a lot of pies but is not the go to solution in that instance?
Just thinking out loud.
Cheers
10 Security Technologies Gaining From Data Breach Hysteria, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EXT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.001(9.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.69M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.0¢ | $84.61K | 7.421M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1009090 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 10931039 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EXT (ASX) Chart |