Islamic terror attacks...I have the solution

Originally posted by jessie1 ↑

"We need our current pollies to hold to account our inept and unaccountable judiciary and security agencies."

Well hellooooo, so in hindsight, suddenly these people should have been locked away when the legal system first encountered them, or at least should have been hit with sledgehammers rather than feathered gavels?

Now surely that would imply unfair treatment and disproportionate human rights abuse against followers of certain faiths and trigger a demand (by our faceless apologists) of swift and harsh treatment against any policeman who dares to ask someone to lift their burka, or a judge who dares to take a person charged with incitement of hate to task.

i'm flabbergasted at this wierd, (though selective) admission in hindsight that the apologists have held our legal system hostage and needs a shake up.

Are you happy to start with, for example, those who thumb their noses at and refuse to stand up in court for a judge? How many years (non parole) can we add to their suddenly non parole sentence for holding a sign like 'death to aussie infidels' (or burning an Aussie flag) that they suddenly are not granted bail for after a trial is amazingy not thrown out on a legal technicality and unbelievably not rescheduled for 18 months time?

What would happen to all those ratbag, professionally unemployed protesters whose actions are endorsed by those hidden apologists when they are arrested (non parole, no bail) for spitting in the faces of the police or burning an effigy of our Prime Minister...and what would happen when they are told they must work for the dole (for struggling farmers in rural areas) upon release?

No dipping the toe in when it suits - you are either 'all in' or not. Political overtolerance does not allow for selective ignorance when it suits (even though it demands the blind eye when the philosophy says so) - that would be proof that the very leftard, apologist philosophy that underpins it is an ass...

...sueely not.

Expand

Jessie1, you've misrepresented my post and demonstrated a lack of insight into what I've posted for years on this forum.

At no stage have I ever been an apologist. Indeed, if I had my way members of our judiciary and our security organisations would be subject to the same expectations we have of almost every other occupation in society.

The abject failure of our judiciary is increasingly enabling so many abuses that the whole rotten mess is approaching a tipping point. One wherein offenders have the upper hand and as we saw today, even allows people facing $110m fraud charges to just head off overseas.
http://www.theage.com.au/business/a...n-fraudster-flee-country-20150109-12kbsa.html

Distributing white hoods and burning crosses will only add to the ranks of offenders and deprive society of what we value so highly. As for establishing legal systems that provide for countless and apparently never-ending appeals, our judicial systems are a sick joke that are being exploited at our expense.

We need to reform those institutions which are failing us and that includes pollies who create laws based on the notion that hardened criminals deserve chance after chance after chance before they are shown the bottom line.

And for the record, I see no point in keeping convicted mass murderers alive. Then again, I would not have offended most of the World's rational people by allowing the Saddam Hussein to be treated the way he was at his execution.