I avoided it following the principle of 'don't feed the trolls', in that you should know full well such questions only end up in a long, boring and pointless thread about moral relativity. Which is why I opted for 'use your common sense' instead. But rather than simply engage in ad-hominems perhaps you can explain why, someone informing a society about the actions of their alleged government is bad? I mean, without simply repeating 'legal', 'illegal' over and over? Why, in this specific case was 'legal' in the right?
