I'm sorry, but that's not how it works. What you're doing here is the essence of the Gish Gallop: put forward a rapid-fire bunch of unsupported assertions, and reverse the onus of proof. Rather than back up your assertions with evidence, you claim that it's your opponents' responsibility to disprove them. That way, for every line of text you post, your opponents have to post 20. Then, if they take the time to do so, rather than accede anything you'll just post another half-dozen claims.
It's a thoroughly lazy and dishonest way of debating, and I'm not going to play.
