“Forget about the 20% reduced output, it isn't about that!
Look at it this way, if you could buy a fuel for your car that gave you a performance that was 20% less than petrol, but only cost 3% of what petrol costs, which would you be buying?”
If you are referring to a contractual obligation – And that is what Silex would be engaged in – a 20% reduction in output would be a major failure in meeting contract obligations ---And this is exactly what happened at Nofa, and may have happened at Mildura......
As an example:
A - Silex signs a contract that promises to deliver, upon completion, 10MW of power.
B - The buyer, after signing contract, purchases equipment that requires a minimum of 9.1MW to operate.
C – Silex completes installation and tells buyer, “Sorry, the system will only give you 8MW of power.”
D – The buyer replies, “Oh, okay.” I doubt buyer saying, "okay" & I don’t think it will be okay.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLX
- Explanation needed & make it a good one
Explanation needed & make it a good one, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$5.12 |
Change
0.050(0.99%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.212B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$5.05 | $5.12 | $4.90 | $1.874M | 373.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2313 | $5.12 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$5.13 | 1044 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2313 | 5.120 |
1 | 1137 | 5.070 |
1 | 2419 | 5.060 |
1 | 1521 | 5.050 |
4 | 11054 | 5.040 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.130 | 1044 | 1 |
5.150 | 125 | 1 |
5.250 | 2000 | 1 |
5.270 | 900 | 1 |
5.300 | 100 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |