Obviously not from the article I linked at thread header.
"The ACOSS report said that over half of the benefit of "negative gearing" deductions goes to the top 10 per cent of personal taxpayers, earning more than $100,000 a year."
- Forums
- Property
- Why Negative Gearing should be scrapped
Why Negative Gearing should be scrapped, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)