minesite article: telling it how it is, page-19

this article completely misses the point rio submission was on the basis of public interest not whether caz's lease was invalid

caz lease has been terminated...thus for it to be terminated it had to be accepted in the first place

get with guys the real argument is whether the public interest is sered by giving to rio...given that caz hd will, resources (both financial & technical) to develop the deposit the first time in 20 years that the deposit had any chance of being developed

lastly the mining act is strictly adhered to (till this point) on a first in basis

if bowler was so convinced of his reason way has not explained......a bit hard to give political corruption as a reason though