Ann: Brainchip Race Car Video Presentation, page-37

This has nothing to do with the quality of graphics on display. The boundaries of the race track are not visual but defined in the racetrack program. So what the demo looks like is irrelevant. This is not a graphics chip, the point of the exercise is to show the learning, not to have it displayed in 1040p resolution.
The conditions on the track and the rules of the test are the same for both chips. The old chips has a different learning routine which dictates that is returns to the start, this is why it is a slow learner. BrainChip does not have this restriction because it has learnt the path already taken and then uses the current "crash" into the wall to adjust and continue, continuously learning.

Imo the conditions of the test are identical and just shows how poor the previous "best" neural chip is.
This is why BrainChip is the game changer.

People need to stop reading into things that are not there.

Once we seperate the wheat from the chaff the price will rise based on what is clearly been demonstrated.

DYOR