I don't believe that's what the trial is about. It can't be changed from seeking court orders that the cancellation of a marketing agreement is valid (plus potential damages) into one about conspiracy to defraud mid-way through. My understanding is that IG's statements are relevant only in as far as how his belief about the aims of Q affected his decisions about selling FM, cancelling the marketing agreement etc.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- Settlement/purchase options
Settlement/purchase options, page-515
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 111 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some