Completely incorrect, your problem is that your so overly eager to "finding errors in your arguments" that you are entirely missing the basis and points of the discussion regarding UAVs.
At no point have I ever said that UAVs are a threat to NEA, what I have said is that NEA should be looking to partner with a US or Israel UAV manufacture, the future platform for aerial imagery is obviously going to be UAVs what NEA needs to do is make sure it's their imagery being used by a percentage of that rapidly growing market.
Whether they be high altitude large UAVs or small helicopter drones.
Once again NEA doesn't make Cessna's they are not in competition with UAV manufactures, NEA needs to make sure in the future they are partnered with the right platforms to maximise future revenue.
"overly negatively biased against Nearmap" Disagree, even if I was that's good for discussion unless you want to just logon and surround yourself by a cheer squad giving each other high fives on every announcement good or bad.
Tech stocks like this if invested long term you have to keep your eye on the ball every month as to the industry developments and direction.
Instead of just attacking because you perceive me as overly negative, consider there might be some benefit to the industry discussion here considering I have nearly 30 years experience investing in aerospace, defence, security and advanced technology companies. Plus my own aviation experience.
