Ardent - you really resist logical discussions dont you?
Lets say the death toll from Saddam in Iraq over the years is as suggested by most Human Right agencies of between 200-250,00 people and with at least that many still at risk if the regime stayed in power (and I wont substantiate this - its fact do some research)
Then - as unpalatable as further deaths may seem to you in an armed process to remove the regime - and given the civilian death toll which numbers in the hundreds (~450) at the moment double, trebles or even a 10-fold to say 4,500 (an absolutely Armagennonesque scenario considering the death toll to date and hence most most unlikely) - still.....is that not worth it?
Yes, it is a calculation of the relative death tolls and gruesome and macabre - but is it not a valid comparison??
It is truely a moral dilemma that you seem to refuse to see. To do nothing WILL lead to a FAR GREATER death toll.
Fact.
- Forums
- General
- daver says it's no bloodbath!
daver says it's no bloodbath!, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online