what happened to the drilling results?, page-17

Quite clearly @DaLatta, Ton were looking to upgrade a targeted area to a measured level using the assays ann'd received on 26th February.

Now again quite obviously imo, they perhaps could not get the area or volume of graphitic mineralisation to code for a measured/targeted resource that suitably fitted their projected volume/minelife and projected pit depth.
So further infill drilling has been completed at Nicanda Hill to enable such area to be upgraded to code. 1 Diamond Drill and 1 RC rig were used and then onto Ancuabe I believe.

Its actually very simple logic, please do not feel concerned for me over the validity of the Triton resource.
Perhaps look into Syrah's past Ann'd strip ratios and work out if they were disclosed excluding any non graphitic waste or intrusion?
Or even perhaps study the validity of the met work released and where it was from? Maybe no lies hey, just perhaps a little misinterpretation through interpretation.
At Syrah's projected ramped up production of 380Kt per annum output, the Initial Higher Grade mining target would be reduced to around 3 years life would it not DaLatta?

But then again maybe you can stand on the Western edge of the defined Nicanda Hill resource footprint and have a visual glance down the most westerly drill hole just like Cannacord did?
They must have truly unbeleievable eyesight considering the market and Cannacord already had Ann'd drill data from the Hole which clearly showed High grade interception defining a suitable/sensible resource definition boundary at around 150m depth or so.