On the surface, (pun not intended), I would agree. However, I think the delineation between what is apportioned a credit versus not is far less black and white;
http://www.flyash.info/2011/168-Cooper-2011.pdf
"certain fly ash projects can create carbon credits under mandatory carbon trading programs, as well as , under certain voluntary carbon trading programs'.
The other question was pertaining to addressable market, I am keen to seek consensus here?
Addressable market and Carbon Sequestration, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)