"That does not validate your position just because we can rule out the opposing theory."
Agree. In my opinion it is evidence for evolution that validates my position, not debunking the existence of ID - debunking the existence of a creator would be a futile exercise as it would be trying to prove a negative. The belief in the existence of a creator can only be supported by evidence that such a creator exists.
"Is it control and intervention or has his creator rolled the dice and let come what may."
In my view neither because I don't believe there is sufficient evidence of the existence of a creator, especially one that intervenes positively in the affairs of humankind, to warrant such belief.
My understanding of Wafflehead's position is that he is offering a modus operandi of creation by a creator. I think that he is is taking it one step further than most creationists do who don't appear to offer a meaningful modus operandi.
I hope Wafflehead will correct me if a I have misunderstood him.
