Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

BLR

0.00%

0.2¢ black range minerals limited

your plan after a no vote?, page-31

First 31 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
cait11

458 Posts.

11/08/15

15:08

Post #: 15786590
Share

Originally posted by buc ↑

Remember Paladin's Kayelekara Sandstone deposit? Ablation Tech loves Sandstone deposit's.
You reckon Azarga might change it's voting position?

Kayelekera is located in northern Malawi, 52km west (by road) of the provincial town of Karonga and 12km south of the main road that connects Karonga with the township of Chitipa to the west.

Kayelekera is a sandstone-hosted uranium deposit associated with the Permian Karoo sediments and is hosted by the Kayelekera member of the North Rukuru sediments of the Karoo.

The mineralisation is associated with seven variably oxidised, coarse grained arkoses, separated by shales and chocolate coloured mudstones. Uranium mineralisation occurs as lenses primarily within the arkose units and, to a lesser extent, in the mudstone units. The lowest level of known mineralisation currently is at a depth of approximately 160m below surface.

Kayelekera is owned 100% by Paladin (Africa) Limited (PAL), a subsidiary of Paladin. In July 2009, Paladin issued 15% of equity in PAL to the Government of Malawi under the terms of the Development Agreement signed between PAL and the Government in February 2007.

The Mining Licence, ML152, covering 5,520 hectares, was granted in April 2007 for a period of 15 years, following the completion of the Development Agreement with the Government of Malawi. A Bankable Feasibility Study and EIA followed, and construction started in June 2007 with completion in early 2009.

Due to the sustained low uranium price, it was announced in February 2014 that processing would cease at Kayelekera and that the site would be placed on care and maintenance.

Following a period of reagent run-down, processing was completed in early May 2014. It is expected that production will recommence once the uranium price provides a sufficient incentive (circa US$75/lb) and grid power supply (ESCOM) is available on site to replace the existing diesel generators with low cost hydroelectricity.

Expand

BUC,

What is your operational and strategic plan for blr in a no vote situation? Why won't you answer the simple question? Or do you not have a plan? If you don't gave a plan, how can you tell everyone to vote no? Surely you only vote no if you have a better plan than Glasier? Where is your better plan?

Cait

BLR Price at posting: 0.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

AW1

American West does it again at Storm with visually identified thick copper hits at Cyclone, Lightning Ridge

PYC

PYC commences new study on drug for eye condition Retinitis Pigmentosa type 11

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

LGM

Legacy shares jump on discovery of multiple epithermal veins at Bauloora JV

GRE

Greentech finds lithium trend across 5.5 km at WA's Kobe South