m0ngy,
what is the source of your claim that "The focus will be medical adequacy rather than effectiveness."
You state this as a fact, rather than your opinion
If you read the 2 consultation papers released in Sept 2015 by the Department of Health, you will see:
word "adequacy" appears 0 times
word "effectiveness" appears a total of 13 times
In simpler words: based on some factual analysis, your post appears to be total rubbish!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CAJ
- Medicare review
Medicare review, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 107 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAJ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $314.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
29.8¢ | 29.8¢ | 29.5¢ | $181.8K | 611.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 478513 | 29.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
30.0¢ | 1223144 | 14 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 154122 | 0.295 |
8 | 422031 | 0.290 |
2 | 80000 | 0.280 |
1 | 54 | 0.275 |
1 | 11070 | 0.270 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.300 | 1223144 | 14 |
0.305 | 599561 | 7 |
0.310 | 714920 | 14 |
0.315 | 1120506 | 14 |
0.320 | 783321 | 19 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CAJ (ASX) Chart |