Exchange Rules, page-23

The only thing I've ever said I was confused about is how anybody could claim to have done research on this company and still buy it. I've never said I wan't knowledgeable about the company or the market. And as we've gone along here I've seen more and more that posters really don't know the sales levels or what the cited regulations mean, or that the company has no FR patents, etc. Everybody just gets pissy when presented with the facts.


You are completely misinformed - or more likely just guessing - about how state licenses for law and accounting work in the U.S. As I said before, anybody who is ever registered and gets a license stays in the database and when they don't pay their license fees the database says that and says their license is suspended or awaiting renewal or something similar, depending on state. In cases of misconduct where the license is revoked it will say something like that or disbarred. These databases even keep people in them for years after they're dead.

If you don't want to bother to look at what I cited and only want to drink the NC Kool-Aid that's fine. But the evidence is right there for anyone who claims they actually do research.

I don't have a dog in this fight. I just find it amusing how willing people are to believe what they want and how much they'll avoid anything contrary.