NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud, page-15

  1. 47,456 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    Raiderup, forced to choose between the opinion of global warming Deniers and peer reviewed, cold hard scientific research I think I'll avoid stick with 99.7% of the World's credible scientists:

    "Global temperatures are continuing to climb to fresh records, adding to the urgency of curbing greenhouse gas emissions that are the primary cause, the World Meteorological Organisation says.
    Preliminary agency figures show that for the first 10 months of 2015, average sea and land surface temperatures were 0.73 degrees above the 1961-90 average of 14 degrees. They were about 1 degree warmer than the 1850-1899 period used as a proxy for the pre-industrial era.
    The past five years were also the hottest on record, beating the previous five years, and showing "a continued sustained warming trend" since the mid-1970s. (See chart below.)
    "This is all bad news for the planet," WMO secretary-general Michel Jarraud said, just days before delegates from almost 200 nations would gather in Paris to negotiate a new climate treaty to limit carbon emissions.
    "We have the knowledge and the tools to act. We have a choice," Mr Jarraud said. "Future generations will not." ..."

    http://www.theage.com.au/environmen...resh-temperature-records-20151124-gl7bmf.html

    IMO only those with their heads in the sand can deny that average temperatures have increased by ~7% since 1850!
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.