Remember the treatment was measured on a 100 day survival where 64% of patients responded to treatment, meaning 36% did not. Of that 64%, 100 day survival was 81% with the non responder survival rate at 39%.
Bringing these 2 percentages together gets a 51.8% (0.64*0.81) chance of survival to day 100 when using Prochymal... that's really not that great especially when compared to the non-responder 100 day survival at 39%.
So all up, this treatment provides an additional 12.8% chance of surviving to day 100.... and that costs US $113 000 to $170 000.
With minimal side effects it comes down to cost. Do you think people are willing to pay that much for a 12.8% chance? I think some people will.... but will the majority of the market pay it, maybe, maybe not it will depend on subsidies.
This is a simplified scenario in the fact that I have not accounted for grade of disease (B, C, D), you can do your own math for each grade. Someone please check my logic, I think it is sound. If you can prove otherwise, then good on you.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MSB
- Revenue from Japan
Revenue from Japan, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.31 |
Change
-0.010(0.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.495B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.31 | $1.33 | $1.28 | $1.819M | 1.396M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 29972 | $1.31 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.31 | 2008 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 29972 | 1.305 |
4 | 15000 | 1.300 |
1 | 772 | 1.295 |
6 | 63160 | 1.290 |
2 | 73667 | 1.285 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.315 | 12924 | 1 |
1.320 | 14413 | 3 |
1.330 | 7511 | 1 |
1.350 | 5000 | 2 |
1.355 | 30300 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |