Hi The Smiles and thanks for your response. My apologies for overlooking the date/year of the post YOU created inciting discussion around a comparison of OBJ to Telstra for a valuation over 12 months ago. In my defense, I have been travelling for the last two and a half months with 17 flights; and all that decompression has probably made my brain a little foggy.
The point I feel you are missing is that jm69 simply asked on a discussion forum 'As for a $1 SP, what would the revenue need to be to justify it?'; and a couple of us responded. And your response as a Shareholder was to stifle discussion with terminology like:
'I find it absolutely ridiculous that we are talking about pie in the sky figures throwing around $100m+ revenue when we can't even get $1m/quarter at the moment! Discussions about a SP of $1 are laughable at this point with the current SP situation.
This makes me reminiscent of similar discussions this time last year when people were 'ramping' the stock at 10c.
Let me bring this discussion back down to earth and not get ahead of ourselves. Let's just wait and see what the findings of the latest trials are shall we.'
Whilst I am definately all for both sides of the discussion as has been evident for many years, it really needs to work both ways. It feels a little contradictory that you are able ask for discussion around a valuation, but jm69 is not in relation to a valuation of successful UG data and a commercialsation deal. The time has come for these types of questions as posed by jm69 to be discussed imo. We are getting down to the pointy end of business on many fronts and if UQ data is positive and P&G and other Distributors take BG up, substantial future revenue WILL imo be a reality based on P&G's current business model.
'This makes me reminiscent of similar discussions this time last year when people were 'ramping' the stock at 10c.'
Wasn't the above around the exact same time that you incited the discussion regarding a valuation based on Telstra model? Didn't everybody give you courtesy of a response, without the insinuation of ramping?
No hard feelings here The Smiles, but no-one has the right on this forum to stifle discussion either way and I again apologise if you feel my high-lighting your post was me 'mugging' you. It is simply well overdue discussion that should not be considered as ramping; but rather a reality of some of the probabilities that are currently sitting on OBJ's imminent horizon. OBJ Management also do not like any kind of forward-looking statements, but the reality there also is that they Know exactly the type of potential we are all sitting on.
(20min delay)