Questions remain for the AGW alarmists, page-41

He made many good points GM, but our rabid left NEVER address what is said, they prefer character assassination.

And since when has a scientist not been qualified to speak on science? A man with decades of experience in the science world can read on another topic he/she has not explored in depth before, apply knowledge gathered over decades and see errors that a new graduate would never have seen. That is how peer review is supposed to work, not pal review.