I understand how hard it is for you to understand (and even worse accept) Eagle, but let me provide you with the direct quote from the report .....
"54. The first such common theme is the propensity for the creation of false records. This has occurred across numerous case studies. To take some examples, .... In the Unibuilt case study, an employee was falsely described as a research officer for a labour hire company when in fact he was working as an electoral officer for a candidate for a Parliamentary seat."
Now, I'll go slowly for you, its very simple, who was the candidate for the Parliamentary seat that was being referred to?
Are you claiming its Elvis or Bugs Bunny champ?
The same candidate who was the direct beneficiary of a Unibuilt 'employee was falsely described as a research officer for a labour hire company when in fact he was working as an electoral officer'. Who was that 'electoral officer' working for there champ?
Elvis or Bugs Bunny?
Poor Billy - creation of false records. Poor thing. Or is he Sargent Schulz like - incompetent? He's gone either way.
Has it sunk in yet or is the truth too painful to accept?
No overreach champ - Bill Shorten was 'the candidate for the Parliamentary seat' the 'electoral officer' was working for - you weren't paying sufficient attention when the Royal Commission was sitting.
