I understand how hard it is for you to understand (and even worse accept) DaveR, but let me provide you with the direct quote from the report .....
"54. The first such common theme is the propensity for the creation of false records. This has occurred across numerous case studies. To take some examples, .... In the Unibuilt case study, an employee was falsely described as a research officer for a labour hire company when in fact he was working as an electoral officer for a candidate for a Parliamentary seat."
Now, I'll go slowly for you, its very simple, who was the candidate for the Parliamentary seat that was being referred to?
It was Bill receiving the undeclared kickbacks from Unilever champ.
It was Bill who was the direct beneficiary of a Unibuilt 'employee was falsely described as a research officer for a labour hire company when in fact he was working as an electoral officer'.
Poor Billy - creation of false records. Poor thing. Or is he Sargent Schulz like - incompetent? He's gone either way.
Has it sunk in yet or is the truth too painful to accept?
Or alternatively are you suggesting we overlook Bill getting undeclared kickbacks whilst selling our the worker he was being paid to represent?
