Kimberlites, page-13

Yes i think we are both close to the truth. It was a quick response on my phone.
If you go back to i think sept ann the company states that the material was showing both signs of alluvial and elluvial traces. I think this was confusing for them at first becuase both seems contradictory. Their best explanation at the time was the source being proximal. Now they know L259 encompasses the whole of block8 and beyond. Given the size of 110ha and counting it gives credit that the elluvial has came from the block8 section of L259 and the alluvial could have traveled from the nothern perimeter. Perhaps some from further targets upstream also. But it is certainly large enough that the alluvial gravels is from the same kimberlite. Nothing confirmed yet. But bulk sampling of the perimeter will give us some big answers. And that wont take long imo. Weeks rather than months to see of our theory is correct. Remember when they start drilling in the coming weeks. Anns will come thick and fast now imo. Our BOD expect gazetting any day now also!