Very prospective ??
Based on what exactly given :
1. Tech is unproven
2. Tech is unproven
3. Tech is unproven
And you want to pay $18m to have A 40% LICENCE into this 'very prospective' tech ?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETR
- Ann: Quarterly Activities & Cashflow Report
Ann: Quarterly Activities & Cashflow Report, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
Add ETR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.88M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
ETR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable