"scant regard for the company and it's shareholders" Hmm Is that the priority for this forum?
It is quite evident that anyone presenting a contrary position or one that could be interpreted negatively by the back-slappers so prominent in these forums, quite sad really. Just look at the "likes" against contributors ... so often the one who shoots the messenger with ridicule without challenging evidence gets all or most of the credits and the whistleblowers, cold hard evidence providers (when it affects share prices negatively), are howled down, declared as down-rampers, get few likes and so many times are the subject of personal attacks. I really don't get it.
A free press is often asked why they don't report good news, the bad news is what is evident in newspapers everywhere. However, isn't it the 'bad news' that holds our democracy to account? Praising each other, supporting each other's emotional roller coasting so much a part of present investment life is NOT going to affect the share price at all. In fact it is giving people false hope and causing them to hang in when they should have been OUT earlier.
For the record, I am looking to be a shareholder in LNG at some point but not now, based on my research. I am not here to give respect, I'm here to learn and provide input based on knowledge and experiences. I welcome constructive challenge, other and opposing views, but I find personal attacks and ridicule stupid and unprofitable.
On your final point, re Klarman holding LNG or not - I was really making the point that if he is esteemed as a bell-weather for in a related company, would it not be a good indicator if he was a participant in a stock with more upside potential if LNG is at that point now. I ask the question, that's all.
LNG Price at posting:
63.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Not Held
