The transgender agenda in OUR shcools., page-176

First 176 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
picastoc

28,939 Posts.

424

15/02/16

09:03

Post #: 17018704
Share

Originally posted by picastoc ↑

Oh, so it is all up to a person's "enjoyment" of a past encounter - I see. You are now struggling greatly to make sense.
"........there is scant evidence of someone transitioning from one sexual orientation to the other" Difficult to find studies where people admit to this transitioning. All I know, is that little old me, who doesn't know much about these matters certainly know of people who have, indeed, "transitioned". These are, more often than not, young women who, largely because they know from their friends what it is to be 'gay', then they give that a try for a while. Various outcomes. A couple have stayed with their 'girl friends' (after being let down by their boyfriends) and another, 'transitioned' to a male from a female and is now happily married with two children and very strong in her relationship. These are young women I knew from being in the teaching profession. So, a bisexual is now someone who once enjoyed a sexual experience with each of the sexes? The truth is it is the individual concern who labels themselves and not YOU who can do so. Imagine how impossible it would be to make a study of this as most people are not prepared to risk their current relationship by threatening it by a declaration that they once were in an 'enjoyable' act with someone of the alternative sex to the one they are with now. Wouldn't happen. The women gays I know are often those who have had an unsatisfactory relationship with a member of their opposite sex and have not bothered to stay around trying to learn or tolerate the lack of skills which dealing with the opposite sex requires.

So, that you so much for your "you're welcome to post studies if you have any" invitation. You are not only able to mock but you are pretty crash hot in attempting to prove points by issuing impossible requests such as these. You are about as accurate in your commentary as you are modest. Goodbye.

Expand

Just imagine answering questions re sexuality and find the likes of you as the interviewer. Quote of your evidence of potential to mock them - "This would make for a great Monty Python skit. "No sir I'm not homosexual, you see that was yesterday!""
It is also an attempt at humour which falls on its face for it reveals the evident naivity of the interviewer it his/her attempt to find humour in someone else's sexuality. To couch it in a way that parodies a Monty Python skits (with their appeal to a large audience) suggests you to be totally out of touch with reality. You are certainly an inappropriate person to be discussing these sensitive issues with.
Final word to you now.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

AII

Nasdaq-listed Almonty Industries receives substantial cash injection

PH2

Hydrogen at a crossroads: Plug Power, Pure Hydrogen and Nel ASA between opportunity and crisis – Your profit strategy

ASX Market Open: Downturn as tariffs regime finally pushes US CPI higher | July 16

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock