Share
3,158 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 154
clock Created with Sketch.
16/02/16
14:55
Share
Originally posted by gassed
↑
Trumpy. Because I want someone who "is on the other side" to comment. As you are perfectly aware, what I have seen in the last 8 months goes against everything that I was seeing and saying pre-Pearl. I stick with those views absolutely as the "other opinions" were based upon circumstantial evidence and there was enough "fundamental" stuff to prevent going for the jugular. Remember, I sold months before Pearl!!
But, I can see absolutely no fundamental evidence to support what has been happening since Pearl and am now thinking completely differently as we certainly have a totally different company and set of circumstances.
I can in NO way raise a case in my own mind to logically explain what "appears" to be happening. I keep asking the same question as I am certain that there are others in this forum who can make a case better than I can. But, there is a vital piece of "evidence" missing before a definitive, actionable accusation can be made. The current Top 20 list.
Still doesn't bother me one iota except the frustration of being so near but so far from that end story that I want to hang around to see.
Expand
Gassed CTR prior to Pearl had an asset taht was producing, unfortunately it was managed by OKAP. CTR post Guatemala has a tyre recycling concept apparently still managed by OKAP ( Eastman still on board ) no difference just another way of fleecing holders and looking after mates.