delux,
Sorry to say this but I believe you are muddying the waters.The C19 section in Atzam2 was the one that
produced until something went wrong I recall 1000b/day. Atzam4 was was to test C19 but something also
went wrong. The principal purpose of Atzam5 was to test C19. This time a salt plug?
A quick response. If you want more detail and are not prepared to go through the CTR announcements
please let me know
I have thought about Schlumberger. They would have been hired by LAR as Atzam5 operators. As such, there is no way they would respond to any questions on Atzam5 that did not come from LAR management.
Atzam 5 is alive, page-16
Add ETR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.88M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| ETR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable