Just curious about this "on foot" stuff. Interesting that wording about Wade says "extensions" and not just "extension". So it seems that Wade strung them out more than just the once. How long do you let it go on before agreement is not on foot anymore? I think having an agreement "on foot" that the purchaser has not intent of paying for is as good as having no agreement.
Also interesting that if noteholders agree to extension, Mgmt will agree to independent investigator, BUT note the terms.... (on a confidential basis). Hmmm... What could be so secret now?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?