CN at MMC, page-47

"We have the best of drill managers the best of drillrigs and all these decisions will have been made by the JV, I think the disapointment by some over the resources update is turning into a CNE bashing exersise with a large dose of conspiracy thrown in..""

Hmmm.. that must be referencing to me again ?? Get a life mate.
Read my posts.. you seem to know a heck of a lot about what's going on... if so (and by the way.. I'm not, and have not raised anything that points to conspiracy theory) why not fill in the gaps for us....

My disappointment lies in the fact that CNE's upgrade include SNE2 results, yet on C2 numbers there is a 80mb difference to RISC's C2 numbers.. Now I would assume that experts, whether involved in the JV , or whether independent, would at least be close in each others ballparks.. 80mb is a discovery on its OWN!! Well, if you're ok with that sort of discrepancy, fine...it just indicates to me that some are clearly missing the issues and the picture.. so be it.
RISC's numbers was without SNE2 result... Factor a well with a 9000bp into calculations and RISC might come up with a 700mb 2C number... double that of CNE... but it's all ok... and we should not question because the experts working for CNE and the experts working for FAR are all singing from the same songbook... just different songs...

My question is why the huge discrepancy?.. You seem to have all the answers so I'm looking forward to a credible explanation for the discrepancy. The wisdom of some on this thread truly astounds... and we are all the more happy.
GLA

PS. Whisky.. please put me on ignore so you don't have to read my........