spot the difference, page-34

This whole idea that these potential fields Soreil and Sirius are on different levels which is what people are implying when there is talk of 3 for one drills etc etc.

Is this correct?? Not that I know Jack S... but my picture is not that they are on different levels at all.
I imagine them to be all the same Albian play.
I imagine that some layers perhaps the blocky sands dip into the OWC then emerge from the OWC further south and perhaps north but some of the upper thinner sands again dip and climb but stay above the OWC which is why it's described as part or an extension of the same field in the same Albian play.
So while the field may grow and look like one giant field which it is effectively, in that field to the south and hopefully to the north there will be distinct oil "pools" which would have to be drained separately.
But what I understand that they are saying is that because there is a common OWC and some upper sands that are common and likely in communication it is likely that Soreil and Sirius are all effectively part of SNE.

So my thought is that talk of 3 for 1 is misleading.

Notwithstanding I understand/accept that the BH's play is completely separate and so talk of 2 for 1 is quite valid.
Perhaps someone way more knowledgeable than me could comment, Ya et al.