The regulatory requirement is to "demonstrate the essential requirements of safety and performance have been achieved".
Demonstrating safety alone is, in my experience, very unlikely to suffice. The regulators simply favour approved devices over unapproved devices for which performance has not been scientifically proven via RCT.
The Aus CT / IDE results, if successful, could potentially facilitate the CE approval process.
To The Naysayers, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OSL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $41.62M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $34.82K | 3.319M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 6856710 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 2741527 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OSL (ASX) Chart |