< then the government will never know whether the considerable amount of time it takes to draft new laws will have been wasted. >
That's interesting .... Shouldn't they be discussing it in a "consensus" manner of rationality each step of the way, prior to the "waste" of time & both human/financial resourses, prio to getting to the draft stage?
How long DID the opposition get to discuss the IR Laws? All of ONE hour? Or, was it even less? How many pages was in that bill?
And the disaster that was the "privatisation" of the Snowy Rvier Scheme cost taxpayers, how much? How long was that discussed in the 'party' room?
Just interested in people's thoughts, that's all. Thanks for yours.
