- The risked oil and natural gas in-place estimates are derived by first estimating the volume of in-place resources for a prospective formation within a basin, and then factoring in the formation’s success factor and recovery factor. The success factor represents the probability that a portion of the formation is expected to have attractive oil and natural gas flow rates. The recovery factor takes into consideration the capability of current technology to produce oil and natural gas from formations with similar geophysical characteristics. Foreign shale oil recovery rates are developed by matching a shale formation’s geophysical characteristics to U.S. shale oil analogs. The resulting estimate is referred to as both the risked oil and natural gas in-place and the technically recoverable resource. The specific tasks carried out to implement the assessment include:
Conduct a preliminary review of the basin and select the shale formations to be assessed.
Determine the areal extent of the shale formations within the basin and estimate its overall thickness, in addition to other parameters.
Determine the prospective area deemed likely to be suitable for development based on depth, rock quality, and application of expert judgment.
Estimate the natural gas in-place as a combination of free gas1 and adsorbed gas2 that is contained within the prospective area. Estimate the oil in-place based on pore space oil volumes.
Establish and apply a composite success factor made up of two parts. The first part is a formation success probability factor that takes into account the results from current shale oil and shale gas activity as an indicator of how much is known or unknown about the shale formation. The second part is a prospective area success factor that takes into account a set of factors (e.g., geologic complexity and lack of access) that could limit portions of the prospective area from development.
For shale oil, identify those U.S. shales that best match the geophysical characteristics of the foreign shale oil formation to estimate the oil in-place recovery factor. For shale gas, determine the recovery factor based on geologic complexity, pore size, formation pressure, and clay content, the latter of which determines a formation’s ability to be hydraulically fractured. The gas phase of each formation includes dry natural gas, associated natural gas, or wet natural gas. Therefore, estimates of shale gas resources in this report implicitly include the light wet hydrocarbons that are typically coproduced with natural gas.
Technically recoverable resources4 represent the volumes of oil and natural gas that could be produced with current technology, regardless of oil and natural gas prices and production costs. Technically recoverable resources are determined by multiplying the risked in-place oil or natural gas by a recovery factor.
Based on U.S. shale production experience, the recovery factors used in this supplement as in the previous report for shale gas generally ranged from 20 percent to 30 percent, with values as low as 15 percent and as high as 35 percent being applied in exceptional cases. Because of oil’s viscosity and capillary forces, oil does not flow through rock fractures as easily as natural gas. Consequently, the recovery factors for shale oil are typically lower than they are for shale gas, ranging from 3 percent to 7 percent of the oil in-place with exceptional cases being as high as 10 percent or as low as 1 percent. The consultant selected the recovery factor based on U.S. shale production recovery rates, given a range of factors including mineralogy, geologic complexity, and a number of other factors that affect the response of the geologic formation to the application of best practice shale gas recovery technology. Because most shale oil and shale gas wells are only a few years old, there is still considerable uncertainty as to the expected life of U.S. shale wells and their ultimate recovery. The recovery rates used in this analysis are based on an extrapolation of shale well production over 30 years. Because a shale’s geophysical characteristics vary significantly throughout the formation and analog matching is never exact, a shale formation’s resource potential cannot be fully determined until extensive well production tests are conducted across the formation.
https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/
https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/pdf/Argentina_2013.pdf
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- 88E
- Some basic oil in place figures
Some basic oil in place figures, page-84
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 67 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.86M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $31.76K | 15.34M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 14573501 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 473268494 | 221 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 13210001 | 0.002 |
222 | 902354202 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 435695727 | 211 |
0.004 | 268594591 | 99 |
0.005 | 111579541 | 42 |
0.006 | 36092900 | 34 |
0.007 | 24363917 | 21 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 30/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
88E (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online