Bugotu Landowners Association Hits Back At Axiom, page-27

To All,

Have I ever said that we did not have either;

a SAA

or

PL.... over San Jorge???

That's not really a question I know the answer....

But here is a couple of real questions for anyone in the know or any of those sophisticated / professional / institutional investors out there

a) Where Can I Find What Legal Standing a Surface Access Agreement Has???

b) What Method Of Arbitration Is There Available To Us If There Are Any (even bloody illegitimate claims) To Customary Ownership Of Said Land???

c) What Is Too Stop BLA From Making A Customary Land Claim Over San Jorge????

of all the people that have been there and spoken to Ryan and seen the ground and have been pictured with these people, how is it none of you can give a straight answer???
These are not tough questions, they are not rude questions, they are not childish questions. And yet everyone can only resort to diversion. If you have no idea, then simply say "i have no idea", if you do not care say you do not care...
But there is no point responding with "we have a SAA and PL, or drilling etc will commence etc" Because so far no one has said why this will not end up in Court again.... San Jorge (as far as I can see) is legally in a worse position then Isabel, we have not title or registration over the land, only the landowners and yet here now as the first document we have the BLA again (FYI they were a claimant in the High Court Case unless you didn't know, oh and the CoA upheld the case on a Customary Land Issue) claiming to have some rights over this land...

here are those questions again for those who missed them

a) Where Can I Find What Legal Standing a Surface Access Agreement Has???

b) What Method Of Arbitration Is There Available To Us If There Are Any (even bloody illegitimate claims) To Customary Ownership Of Said Land???

c) What Is Too Stop BLA From Making A Customary Land Claim Over San Jorge????